Re: Update ja-ptex for teTeX3

[Min Sik Kim <minskim@NetBSD.org>]

On May 13, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Kouichirou Hiratsuka wrote:
>
> I think the ptex installed files are not useful for teTeX commands.
> However, to my understanding share/texmf-local is texmf tree for TeX
> packages.  Is this incorrect?

For a TeX implementation that tex.buildlink3.mk is aware of, yes.  It  
is not so clear for ptex since it maybe considered as another TeX  
implementation with its own TeX and LaTeX commands.

I don't have a strong opinion on this.  So either having a separate  
texmf tree for ptex or sharing the texmf tree with teTeX is fine with  
me.  But if we take the latter, there are a few rules that it must  
follow, e.g., including print/teTeX/module.mk, using  
PKG_LOCALTEXMFPREFIX instead of hardcoding texmf-local, honoring TDS,  
etc.  The attached patch modifies ja-ptex-share to do all these  
things.  Its do-install target is long to install files into the  
right places in TDS.  The patch also adds "bibtex" to the list of  
directories created by print/texmf-dirs.  Other ptex-related packages  
need similar changes.

Regards,
Min

ja-ptex-share.diff